Blueprint

Blewbury Parish Plan Project

Archive Page

The Parish Plan was completed in 2004. This page has not been updated since then.
For current information on Blewbury go to the main Blewbury site.


Plan Ahead
 

Poster Presentation October 2003

 

Blewbury Site;   Planning Site;   Open Days May 2003;  

Introduction;   Recreation;   Meeting Rooms;   Roads and Parking;   Footpaths;   Initiatives;   Village Design; Other Issues;


Introduction

Following the survey of the live issues in Blewbury between February and May this year, five working parties have been discussing the policies that should be in a 10 year plan for the Parish.

A presentation on the 3rd October, 2003 showed in outline what the working parties have suggested. The proposals are ideas of what might be chosen to be included in the long term plan for Blewbury. The proposals had not been reviewed outside the individual working parties, and they had not been discussed by the Parish Council. Over 100 people attended the presentation in the form of a poster display, and 29 comment forms were returned. This paper includes the text of the posters at this presentation, with the feedback received from those who filled up comment forms.

The proposals for the Plan do not address all the concerns raised in the survey of live issues for three main reasons:

  1. Some issues are within the responsibilities of single organisations in the village, or are short term issues which did not fit into a 10 year plan. These issues are being listed and the organisations will be informed that the concerns have been raised.
  2. Some issues are covered by higher level plans, for example by the District Council or the County Council. The plan for main roads in the Didcot Area Transport Plan is an example. We can influence these discussions directly but it is not useful to cover the same ground again in a Parish Plan.
  3. Then for some issues the working parties have not been able to come up with a useful initiative for Blewbury.

The poster display did not attempt to cover all the arguments for each proposed policy.

Top of Page

Recreation

L1 Policy - The management of the Recreation Ground should be reconsidered with a view to setting up a management structure devolving more responsibility for developments on the Recreation Ground and its management on the users of the Recreation Ground, and particularly the active sports clubs.

Votes 6 ticks 1 query 3 crosses

Additional Facilities

Ideas for additional facilities which have been raised include:

Ideas for indoor recreation have included Indoor Croquet and Carpet Bowls.

Comments

  1. Would like clarification. Why another committee is thought likely to have more success than the present RGMC.
  2. Floodlight croquet – mad (only played outdoors in summer!)
  3. No lighting on grounds
  4. Opposed to any floodlighting
  5. Against floodlighting anywhere – unsuitable for this village.

L2 Policy - Additional provision for sport is to be welcomed provided there is a suitable group or club who will sponsor and oversee the provision. The community should not develop such provisions speculatively without such sponsorship.

Votes 11 ticks no crosses

Comments

1. Provided it has support and is maintainable.

L3 Policy - Any new provision for active outdoor sport should be sited on the Recreation Ground. This allows best use of the common facilities on the site such as the pavilion.

Votes 10 ticks no crosses

L4 Policy - A larger pavilion with more facilities is required. Redevelopment on the current site is appropriate.

Votes 9 ticks no crosses

Comments

1. Cost?

L5 Policy - The Pavilion should be managed in a way which allows proper maintenance and use of its facilities.

Votes 13 ticks no crosses

The Scout Hut

The Scout Hut is a good sized building leased by the Scouting Association. It is used occasionally by the venture scouts from Hagbourne. There is no longer a scout group in Blewbury.

L6 Policy - The Parish Council should seek to regain responsibility for the Scout Hut so that this valuable asset can be used more effectively. Ideally it should be managed with the rest of the Recreation Ground.

Votes 11 ticks no crosses

The Old Tennis Court Site

As new sporting facilities should be on the Recreation Ground this site is now redundant.

L7 Policy - Consideration should be given to selling the old tennis court opposite the Barley Mow and using the money to improve other facilities in the village, provided the donors who kindly provided this tennis court for the Village are happy with the proposal.

Votes 12 ticks no crosses

Top of Page

Meeting Rooms

The Village Hall meeting rooms are heavily booked for weekday evenings, in many cases on a regular weekly basis. There is pressure for more rooms to book. The current supply makes it difficult to arrange occasional activities. At present noisy activities in one part of the hall affect the other part. Some users, notably the Bridge Club, find the Vale Room is too small for their purposes and would benefit from a larger venue. The school would like to make more use of the hall, for example for music. The Methodist Church would like to enhance its role as an alternative venue; however additional facilities at the Village Hall site have the advantages of parking and shared use with other facilities.

L8 Policy - The Parish supports efforts to upgrade the facilities at the Methodist Church, but recognises the problems of parking and vehicular access for the disabled.

Votes 8 ticks 2 crosses

Comments

1. No Parking impossible
2. Parking is impossible at the Methodist Chapel and Space should not be made.

L9 Policy - The Parish should enhance the Village Hall, providing a third attractive meeting and activity room in the Village Hall Complex. This should be able to be let independently and be larger than the Vale Room. It should be linked to the other meeting rooms so that functions may use all three when appropriate, but should not be affected by noise in the main hall. It should be able to be shared with the school. It will require additional storage, catering and toilet facilities. A joint development with the School for shared use should be sought.

Votes 12 ticks 2 crosses

Comments

1. Strongly agree
2. Disagree – Increasing the size of the hall can only decrease the available parking and increase traffic using Westbrook Street and Berry Lane!!!
3. The extra traffic this would generate would not be tolerated on Westbrook Street. Noisy night and ?? – Blewbury is already full.
4. and the exterior which is so ugly! Also is it not high time the two containers were removed?
5. Reservations on cost

Parking Facilities

Parking for large events with participants from outside the Village can be a problem.

L10 Policy - Private events should make arrangements for off-street parking for their guests.

Votes 11 ticks no crosses

Comments

1. Where?

L11 Policy - Public events should make use of existing parking facilities at the Village Hall and/or Ticker's Folly Field - these may need sign posting.

Votes 7 ticks 1 cross

Comments

1. Will not work (i.e. Tickers Folly)

Co-operation with Neighbouring Parishes

More should be done to work with the surrounding villages to provide activities which may not be viable in a single village. Examples might be ‘Evening classes’ on topics of interest to residents in all co-operating villages.

L12 Policy - The Parish should actively seek greater co-operation with its neighbours, including the use of each other's facilities and shared initiatives

Votes 8 ticks no crosses

Top of Page

Roads and Parking

Most traffic and most serious accidents occur on the two main roads – the A417 and the B4016. These issues are being addressed by the Didcot Area Integrated Transport Strategy project team, which is working with the Parish in producing its recommendations. Thus the Parish Plan does not cover these roads.

Internal Village Roads

The minor roads within the Village are narrow, have sharp bends and were never designed for motor vehicles. Some, such as Church Road, end without provision for turning. A number of the older houses do not have spaces for cars or garages. Even in those that do the occupiers may have more cars than spaces available. Thus in common with many similar villages sections of the internal roads are often obstructed by parked vehicles. This is not only an inconvenience to other road users, but is a serious safety hazard to pedestrians where no footpath exists.

Some drivers have parked in ways that block buses, farm vehicles and emergency vehicles. Others try to avoid this by parking across footpaths blocking users with invalid carriages, pushchairs and the "walking bus" to school. As a result, in feedback from the community requests were made for restrictions on parking on the internal roads and for more off-street parking facilities.

We have concluded that additional public car parks would not reduce significantly the problem of residential parking on the streets. Residents seem reluctant to use remote public car parks for security reasons. More secure private off-street parking facilities for residents should be encouraged.

However, additional well signed public off-street car parking facilities are required for visitors.

T1 Policy - Landholders who can supply safe off-road parking for vehicles should be encouraged to offer this as a service.

Votes 13 ticks no crosses

T2 Policy - A continuing effort should be made to persuade drivers not to park on footpaths and not to park where they are blocking access and causing a visual obstruction to other road users, including pedestrians. Except for loading/unloading vehicles should not park on the internal Village roads without footpaths.

Votes 12 ticks 2 crosses

Comments

1. Against - Where?
2. Against - The problem is ridiculously overstated and the policy is unworkable if not illegal.

Although the nature of the roads means that drivers on the internal roads rarely exceed 30 mph, many drivers have been observed to drive too fast for the prevailing road conditions. For example parents are nervous about allowing their children to walk to and from the school.

T3 Policy - The speed limit on the internal roads should be 20 mph.

Votes 14 ticks no crosses

Comments

1. And on the main A417
2. Definitely 20 mph on internal roads.
3. Impossible to police
4. MWT
5. Noone drives at 20 mph anywhere. There is as danger that this will make all traffic measures look OTT.
6. Am in favour of this – everywhere in the village.

The following internal roads have identified as in need of additional safety improvement.

T4 Policy - Prior's Corner is a blind corner with a junction leading to the Village Hall, the School and Manor Farm. It is dangerous for pedestrians and cars, and awkward for farm machinery and HGV's. It also suffers from severe flooding in wet weather. A comprehensive solution is required - this may involve the widening of the junction of Heather Way with Church End, together with a traffic priority system for the corner and a footpath on the northern side of Church End between the chestnut trees and the houses. The Westbrook should be channelled along its original course on the western side of Manor Farm to eliminate flooding.

Votes 10 ticks 1 cross

Comments

1. A mirror would help
2. A metallic mirror is badly needed.
3. Pryors corner needs a metallic mirror as well as the suggested improvements.
4. No traffic lights
5. Agree with flood measures – not convinced that the traffic problem is as bad as stated.

Note by co-ordinator: The working party were told by the transport advisors that a mirror in this location was not a good idea as it could not cover the whole area and would give a false sense of security.

T5 Policy - Berry Lane is very narrow at the point it crosses the Mill Brook. Any pedestrian can be vulnerable if vehicles arrive from both directions at the same time. A solution which allows the pedestrians to walk the road without danger from motor vehicles is required - this may involve a traffic priority system incorporating a marked pedestrian lane.

Votes 10 ticks 5 crosses

Comments

1. Especially support T5
2. See objection to larger hall numbered 2. (encouraging additional traffic?)
3. No urban white lines on Village Roads please.
4. Support only if in keeping with rural character of village.
5. Suggestion for pedestrian marked lane would be ugly – the markings would be permanent – the pedestrians temporary. Where would the lane end?
6. Please no “urban” road markings with lots of signs and paint on the road. The pedestrians could go on a walkway over the stream at the narrowest point.

T6 Policy - The maintenance of the internal roads should be improved. In particular Church End leading to the Church and parts of Church Road are dangerous for cyclists and pedestrians, especially at night.

Votes 9 ticks 1 cross

Comments

1. as is Chapel Lane

General Comments

1. (Against T4,T5,T6) Traffic Calming, reduced speeds and use of mirrors should suffice – making the roads wider will encourage faster speeds!
2. The village should accept that with a medieval; layout a 21st century solution to parking will not be possible. You can’t get a quart into a pint pot!
3. The policy proposals for parking make no constructive solutions. There are more cars in the village than there are or could physically be spaces for. Are the people of Blewbury to change to helicopters which we keep hovered above our homes? Positive solutions not whinging please.
4. No mention of encouraging public transport.

Top of Page

Footpaths and Cycling

T7 Policy - The Parish supports the proposed cycle paths to Upton and the Astons. The styles on the Hagbourne path should be altered to make them suitable for cyclists.

Votes 11 ticks 1 cross

T8 Policy - The footpath beside the A417 from Westbrook Street to Nottingham Fee is unsatisfactory, and is flooded for much of the winter. A long term solution is required not only to eliminate flooding, but also to give adequate width and stability for push chairs and invalid carriages.

Votes 14 ticks 2 crosses

Comments

1. Stop the spring!?

T9 Policy - The internal paths should be adapted to encourage their use by young cyclists and invalid carriages. This requires removal of barriers except those required to discourage cyclists from emerging directly onto roads. A barrier should be retained on the Besselsleigh Road end of the footpath from London Road to discourage the use of this path by motor cycles and horses. For the same reason the end barriers on the path between Rubble Pit Lane and Cow Lane should be retained.

Votes 11 ticks 1 query 2 crosses

Comments

1. How wide do you think a footpath that is suitable for use as a cycleway and footpath would need to be?
2. Internal paths should not be adapted for young cyclists – only for invalid carriages.
3. All cyclists should have bells fitted and use them. I have personally been driven into by a cyclist.
4. Will need to be kept under review – not sure about emphasis on cyclists

T10 Policy - The width and surface treatment of internal footpaths (including those across the Playclose) should be maintained so that they are convenient for invalid carriages and push chairs.

Votes 9 ticks 2 crosses

Comments

1. Surfacing is of course necessary, but the present use of gravel chips is unsatisfactory and sometimes dangerous.
2. Well maintained gravel is actually bad for push chairs.
3. (Against T7,T8,T9,T10) Change to the character of the footpaths should be avoided otherwise their rural charm will be lost and we will be in danger of creating a high speed cycleway at the expense of pedestrians!

T11 Policy - A right of way linking the driveway to the water pumping station to the path across Downside Farm to Woodway should be sought from the landowners.

Votes 10 ticks no crosses

Comments

1. Please may there be an official pathway/steps to give access to and from Rubble Pit Lane and Tickers Folly Field.

Top of Page

Initiatives

Facilities

CF1 Policy - Every effort should be made to retain the provision of a surgery in Blewbury.

Votes 15 ticks no crosses

CF2 Policy - Every effort should be made to retain the provision of local shops in Blewbury. If this requires redevelopments or changes in use – such changes should be considered favourably.

Votes 12 ticks no crosses

Comments

1. We used to have a shop
2. What about a community shop? Instead of whinging about the lack of a shop who amongst us would like the work involved in running one.

CF3 Policy - Agreement should be obtained with Thames Water to overcome the problems with water supply to the fringes of the Village.

Votes 12 ticks no crosses

Policing

Although Blewbury is in a relatively low crime rate area, there are significant concerns about the level of crime and the ability of the Police to combat it. It is not clear that there many additional local initiatives that would help. However the Parish would welcome more local Policing, for example the use of the empty police house in the Village.

CF4 Policy - The Parish will press the Police Authority to use the Police House in Blewbury.

Votes 15 ticks no crosses

Comments

1. No it’s been empty for 2 years at least!

CF5 Policy - The Parish will encourage the fitting of spy-holes on the doors of houses occupied by retired people.

Votes 13 ticks no crosses

Comments

1. CF1-5 All these would help to reduce crime.

Litter & Rubbish

The issue of litter raised the highest number of complaints in the surveys.

CF6. Policy - The Parish will set up a scheme in which people are asked to look after specific areas of the village.

Votes 10 ticks 1 query no crosses

CF7 Policy - The Parish will recommend the placing of a few more litter bins to increase the coverage round the village, and will ensure that these are emptied regularly.

Votes 10 ticks no crosses

‘Wheelie bins’ have been suggested as an alternative to the current collection methods. However this does not appear to be practical in many parts of Blewbury.

Comments

1. Should be mindful of cost not only of installing but also of emptying the bins.
2. Wheelie bins in front or near every house would look terrible.

Fouling and Pets

Dog Fouling is also a subject raised frequently in the survey. Dogs fouling public areas is the fault of their owners. It is particularly objectionable in the Recreation Ground and the Playclose, where it makes recreational activities unpleasant and unsafe.

CF8 Policy - There should be an order prohibiting dogs being let off their leads at either Tickler’s Folly Field or the Playclose.

Votes 12 ticks 3 crosses

Comments

1. Also Church Yard
2. Dog Bins – I have only found one.

Publicity for Events

The use of poles and trees for posters is untidy, and the use of trees may harm the trees. Out of date posters are particularly disliked. One solution proposed is to supply a few official notice boards; however such boards would not be seen by many residents.

CF9. Policy - Posters on poles are acceptable for advertising an event taking place within a few weeks, or to advertise missing pets. Those placing posters should be encouraged to remove them when the event is past or the pet is found. Residents should also be encouraged to remove out of date posters.

Votes 11 ticks no crosses

CF10 Policy - Placing posters on trees is to be discouraged.

Votes 11 ticks 1 query no crosses

Comments

1. and on my cob wall!
2. Trees damaged by drawing pins? Come off it!

CF11 Policy - No new notice boards are recommended.

Votes 10 ticks 2 crosses

Comments

1. If you are not encouraged to use poles or trees, are the notices supposed to self levitate?

Note by Co-coordinator: The working party accepted posters on poles (see policy 9.

Top of Page

Village Design

The Parish Plan will have a separate section covering the features of the village, with suitable maps and photographs. This is not yet ready for presentation. Policies included in this section may include the following.

U1 Policy - There should be no major changes in land use in the Parish in the period of this village plan.

Votes 14 ticks no crosses

U2 Policy -There must be no developments on the green spaces within the village conservation area shown as open land and uncultivated marshland on the Environmental Map.

Votes 15 ticks no crosses

U3 Policy - The Village Envelope as shown in the Landscape Map must be retained. Thus there should be no further development east of Bessels Way; on Woodway Road; south of Pilgrims Way. The green corridors seen from the main road (A417and B4016) approaches to the village should be preserved.

Votes 15 ticks no crosses

Comments

1. No more development on the North Side of Pilgrims Way.

U4 Policy - Where circumstances allow, developments of small, mainly affordable housing would be encouraged. The building of any new larger dwellings would be resisted. This is in line with the policies in the Vale of White Horse District Plan.
[Note: Affordable housing is taken to be that which caters for people who are unable to buy or rent a home, suitable for their needs, on the open market.]

Votes 9 ticks 2 crosses

Comments

1. U1/U4 How will you resolve this dichotomy?
2. Thin end of a wedge
3. No flats
4. Multiple occupancy is a danger with this – traffic/noise – so be careful.
5. Any Planning proposals should be taken on their merits and larger dwellings should be permitted as long as they are of sound design and embrace the vernacular architectural features.

U5 Policy - Provision of sufficient parking spaces is required on any new development.

Votes 12 ticks no crosses

Comments

1. Very important to stop further street parking and congestion.

H1 Policy - In alteration or extension, particularly of the older village properties, the use of traditional materials (brick, thatch and plain clay tile) to match or complement the existing is essential. The use of reclaimed or second hand materials should be encouraged. The scale of any extension should be subordinate to the existing building. The relationship with adjacent properties, and the form and massing, materials, scale, proportions and details of the existing building and proposed works should be carefully considered. Detail of roof edges, window and door jambs and sills and the style, proportion of fenestration is of utmost importance.

Property owners should take account of the Vale of White Horse District Council published guidelines for design whenever alterations, extensions are contemplated.

Votes 12 ticks no crosses

H2 Policy - In the design of any new development relationships with other buildings, form and massing, materials, scale, proportion and detail are also of great importance. Consideration should be given to the relationship of buildings and other features to the street, and to the desirability of providing enclosure and interest.

Votes 11 ticks no crosses

Comments

1. This has not happened to date, why start now?

H3 Policy - Building and property owners are encouraged in all instances to seek qualified advice from the district council or an appropriate professional and to strive for the highest architectural standards.

Votes 10 ticks no crosses

Top of Page

Other Issues

The following issues which will be raised with the appropriate bodies outside the Parish Plan.

Website

The Bulletin is good at publishing future events but information on the past is noticeably lacking. The Initiatives Working Party recommended that Clubs and Societies are encouraged to write articles in the Bulletin recording their activities, both past and future.

Football

Concern was expressed about the lack of current Blewbury players in the Blewbury football team. This does not apparently mean a lack of interest from Blewbury players. There is a lot of competition from other clubs in the area who regularly pinch our better players.

Hall

Many issues have been raised about the Village Hall. Some can be addressed if funds can be found. Others would require an impractical rebuild of the structure.

Buses

Do we want to suggest the 134 service avoids South Street now that larger buses are being used? The suggested route would be via London Road and Bessels Way with stops by the Barley Mow, East fields and Bessels Leigh Road. The requirement for a service to and from Didcot Hospital / Woodlands Surgery is being considered in the forthcoming Area Transport Review.

Comments

1. Integrated bus timetable needed e.g. getting to Wantage/Wallingford or Henley.
2. Also bus connections to Woodlands surgery.
3. There is no need to reroute the A134 service. It is meant to serve the village – e.g. Dibleys would not be served. As a bus user the bus seems to negotiate the roads OK – perhaps could slow down a bit therefore 20 mph
4. The 134 bus should continue to use South Street for the Dibleys Folk.
5. Is there any way of getting far smaller buses for school use? Huge buses/coaches and Westbrook St do not go well together.
6. Buses – yes change the route.
7. 134 bus is too large for South Street.

Volunteers

The lack of volunteers to help community projects was felt to be an important topic and one, if cracked, would help many aspects of life in the village.

Drugs

It was felt that this was a growing problem with the youth of the village. The recreation ground is a particular problem. What thought is being given to education on this topic?

Youth

“We need to find out what the young adults in the village would like to do that is not already catered for. We also need to investigate what is available in Didcot and Wantage and also investigate transport.”

Refuse Collection

There is a problem with refuse collection in some parts of Dibleys and Grahame Close; the latter being primarily due to the amount of car parking.

Comments

1. Refuse Collection – Encourage use of smaller vehicles
2. Please remove old rusting vehicles from Besselsleigh roadside and pavement – what an eyesore.

General Comments

1. Well done – but please can we still keep a village feel/aspect.
2. Many thanks for an excellent and thoughtful display.
3. Beware of any policy that makes Blewbury less like a village and more like suburbia.

Comments more relevant to Didcot Area Transport Strategy

1. Opposed to any speed humps in Oxfordshire Plan – slows up ambulances and fire engines, causes vibration including damage to buildings and noise.
2. A speed camera is required on the A417 to slow traffic travelling east to west approaching the narrow part between the war memorial and the Blewbury Inn.
3. If roundabouts are introduced they should be reasonably large. Mini-roundabouts are not effective in my opinion.

Top of Page

This Project is sponsored by Blewbury Parish Council and the Blewbury Village Society Environmental Group.
If you have any comments or are prepared to take part in the initiative please contact the co-ordinator
John Richards, Brookside, Westbrook Street OX11 9QA (01235-850218).